भारतीय संविधान के अंतर्गत सिद्धांत केस के साथ

 Doctrines under the Indian Constitution — 

📚 Important Constitutional Doctrines in India

Doctrine Meaning Purpose / Use Key Case / Article
Doctrine of Basic Structure Constitution’s core features cannot be amended Prevents Parliament from altering essential features Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
Doctrine of Eclipse A law inconsistent with Fundamental Rights becomes “eclipsed” and unenforceable, but not void Applies to pre-constitutional laws Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v. State of MP
Doctrine of Severability Only the unconstitutional portion of a law is struck down, not the entire law Keeps valid part of legislation intact Article 13(1), R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala case
Doctrine of Waiver A person cannot waive Fundamental Rights Protects rights from being surrendered Behram v. State of Bombay
Doctrine of Pith and Substance Identifies the true nature of a law if there is overlap between legislative subjects Resolves Centre–State conflicts State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara
Doctrine of Colorable Legislation What cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly Prevents misuse of legislative power K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo case
Doctrine of Territorial Nexus Laws can apply to extraterritorial acts if there is sufficient nexus For taxation & criminal jurisdiction Tata Iron & Steel Co. v. State of Bihar
Doctrine of Harmonious Construction Interpreting conflicting provisions so both can work together Avoids constitutional conflict Venkataramaiah case
Doctrine of Lifting/ Piercing the Corporate Veil Corporate identity can be ignored to find real persons behind Used in tax, fraud, public interest matters Life Insurance Corporation case
Doctrine of Prospective Overruling New interpretation applies to future cases only Ensures stability in legal system Golak Nath v. State of Punjab

⭐ Additional Doctrines (brief)

  • Doctrine of Pleasure – Government servants hold office at President/Governor’s pleasure (Art. 310)

  • Doctrine of Repugnancy – When State and Central laws conflict, Central law prevails (Art. 254)

  • Doctrine of State Action – Fundamental Rights enforceable only against the State

  • Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation – Government should follow fair practices



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

संस्कृति पर आधारित एक बहुत ही अच्छा संदेश !

 *पान, बीड़ी, सिगरेट, गुटखा, शराब के विज्ञापन फिल्मी सितारों के तो देखे होंगे। आज नाना पाटेकर का छोटा सा वीडियो सब को सोचने पर मजबूर कर देगा।* 
Read more

Re-enactment Of Struck Down Provisions Shows Forn Of Administration Is Inconsistent With Spirit Of Constitution : Supreme Court On Tribunal Reforms Act

Image
  While  striking down t he Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021, the Supreme Court made a scathing criticism of the re-enactment of the very same provisions, which were earlier struck down by the Court. This, the Court said, showed that the "form of the administration” was inconsistent with the spirit of the Constitution. The judgment authored by  Chief Justice of India BR Gavai  referred to the famous quote of Dr BR Ambedkar that it was possible to pervert the Constitution by making the administration inconsistent with the spirit of the Constitution even while maintaining its form. Noting that the provisions of the 2021 Act were a literal re-enactment of the previous rules relating to Tribunals which were struck down in 2019 (Rojer Mathew), 2020(Madras Bar Association -IV), and 2021 (Madras Bar Association-V) cases, the Court said: "The foresighted constitutional vision of Dr. Ambedkar is strikingly evident in the present series of litigations concerning the tribunal system....
Read more